81 Figure 7. Pie Chart of Emotional Quotient
Based on the result, could be concluded that emosional quotient in Grade X Accounting Student at SMK Negeri 1 Yogyakarta academic year
20152016 in the medium category.
4. Learning Readiness X
3
Data of variable Learning Readiness was collected from questionnaire with 17 questions. Based on the data collected from the questionnaire
distributed to 63 respondents, presented in variable Learning Readiness that the highest score achieved was 68 with the highest possible score was
68 4 x 17, and the lowest score achieved was 40 with the lowest possible score was 17 1 x 17. Based on the data analysis collected, value Mean
M was 53,14, Median Me was 53 and Mode Mo was 50, and Standard Deviation SD was 4,741. In order to conduct the frequency
distribution of Learning Readiness, the steps were as follows: a To determine the interval class
K = 1 + 3,3 log n K = 1 + 3,3 log 63
42.86 57.14
Emotional Quotient
High Medium
Low
82 K = 1 + 3,3 1,79934054
K = 1 + 5,93782381 K = 6,93782381 rounded up to K = 7
b To determine the range of class Range of class
= Maximum score – Minimum Score
= 68 – 40
= 28 c To determine the length of interval class
Class interval length = number of class interval
= =
The frequency of distribution of Learning Readiness could be seen in the table below.
Table 18. Frecuency Distribution of Learning Readiness
No Interval
Frecuency Frecuency
Relative
1 40-43
1 1,59
2 44-47
3 4,76
3 48-51
17 26,98
4 52-55
33 52,38
5 56-59
4 6,35
6 60-63
1 1,59
7 64-68
4 6,35
Total 63
100 Source: Primary data which were processed, 2016
Based on the data of frequency distribution of Learning Readiness above, could be presented in the histogram below.
83 Figure 8. Histogram of Learning Readiness
The data then categorized into the tendency category of Learning Readiness. This meant to know the tendency of each variable score used
on the ideal score of research sample as comparison criteria. The data of research variable was necessary to be categorized with the regulation
below. a. High category
= iM + 1 iSD b. Medium category = iM
– 1 iSD until iM + 1 iSD c. Low category
= iM – 1 iSD
Arikunto, 2006: 264 ideal Mean iM and ideal Standard Deviation iSD calculated based on
the following formula: ideal Mean
= ½ Score Maximum + Score Minimum = ½ 68 + 17
= 42,5 ideal Standard Deviation
=
⁄
Score Maximum - Score Minimum =
⁄
68 – 17
= 8,5
1 3
17 33
4 1
4 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40-43 44-47
48-51 52-55
56-59 60-63
64-68
F rec
uenc y
Interval
Learning Readiness
84 High category
= iM + 1 iSD = 42,5 + 8,5
= 51 Medium category
= iM – 1 iSD up to iM + 1 iSD
= 42,5 – 8,5 up to 42,5 + 8,5
= 34 up to 51 Low category
= iM – 1 iSD
= 42,5 – 8,5
= 34 Based on the calculation, the tendency of frequency distribution of
Learning Readiness could be figured as follows. Table 19. The Tendency Category Learning Readiness
No Interval
Frecuency Frecuency
Relative Category
1 51
43 68,25
High 2
34 – 51
20 31,75
Medium 3
34 Low
Total 63
100 Source: Primary data which were processed, 2016
The table above shows that there were 43 students 68,25 in the high category, 20 students 31,75 in the medium category and there is
no student in the low category of Learning Readiness. Based on the tendency distribution of variable Learning Readiness above, it could be
figured in the following pie chart.
85 Figure 9. Pie Chart of Learning Readiness
Based on the result, it could be concluded that Learning Readiness in Grade X Accounting Student at SMK Negeri 1 Yogyakarta academic year
20152016 was in the high category.
5. Learning Style X
