Monthly Progress Report March 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 19
Deviation : 0.540 -
d. Package 4 : Ipuh – Bantal
Schedule : 0.560
Actual : 0.400
Deviation : 0.160 -
The DSC shall is better to the Contractors of Packages that are lagging behind schedule in order that the negative slippages will not keep on piling up.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and
reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their
supervision procedures.
Based on the result of meeting on February 25
th
, 2014 between PMU, BBPJN II, World Bank, CTC and DSC that the Manual Quality Assurance had been issued by DSC and
checking by CTC. The CTC still verification the manual QA submitted by DSC with General Specification 2010.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows
Appendix E.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as
such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL
study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP or SPPL re used to handle
any minor problem which may arise.
Monthly Progress Report March 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 20
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguard are given in Appendix No. 8 and the following table provides a summary of the work involved in the 21 WINRIP
packages:
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
9 AMDALx1 inc No.17
UKLUPL x 2 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 1
UKLUPL 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP Approved – NOL
issued by WB, except for SPPL and
UKLUPL
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages No.1
and No.17.
AWP-2 8
17 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 8 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 4
UKLUPL 3
AMDAL 6
SLARAP 1 one Study AMDAL
for threes packages, are Packages No.7, 12
and 14 packages on AWP2 AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages, are
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAPx 8
AMDAL Study x 1 UKLUPL x 5
5 UKLUPL
2 Full LARAP
Approved – NOL issued by WB, except
for AMDAL and UKLUPL
Total 21
40 Env=20,Soc=21
17 12
Note: UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB.
All of 21 packages, have required environmental impact investigation. All 41 studies 20 environmental studies need approval of the Environmental Agency BLH,and 21 social
studies SLARAP and LARAP requiring approval of the World Bank. Up to the end of February 2014, there are 17 packages 81 has received BLH approval then the current
have 12 of 21social studies or 57 has received approval from the World Bank.
4.6.2 Environmental and Social Issues
This section outlines the activities of the Social Impact Specialist and the Environmental Specialist during March 2014.
4.6.2.1 Environmental Issues
There are two 2 AMDAL on WINRIP not yet completed with the progress status: Environmental permit letter from Governor is under process progress 98, consist one 1
AMDAL cover the packages of No.7,12 and 14 in West Sumatera, and another cover the
