Linearity Prerequisites Test Analysis

Table 19. The Result of Heteroscedasticity Test No Variable Sig. Conclusion 1 Moving Class Implementation 0.082 There is no heteroscedasticity 2 Accounting Classrooms Facilities 0.770 Source : Primary Data Processed The significances of Moving Class Implementation variables is 0.082 and significances of Accounting Classrooms Facilities variable is 0.770. F emp were found to be 1.645 with 0.201 significances, each variable has significances more than 0.05, it can be concluded that there is no heteroscedasticity.

C. Hypothesis Testing

The analysis technique used to test the first and second hypothesis in this study is an analysis one predictors, while the third hypothesis is by two predictor multiple regression analysis. Both of these analysis techniques using SPSS Statistics 17.0 for windows. The results of these two analyzes were elaborate the influence of each independent variable, such as Moving Class Implementation X 1 and the Accounting Classrooms Facilities X 2 on Students’ Learning Motivation in Accounting Learning Y that is presented in the following table: Table 20. The Results of Simple Regression Analysis Variable r score t score Coef. Const. Notes R emp r table R 2 T emp t table X 1 – Y 0,325 0,239 0,105 2,787 1,995 0,457 49,267 Positive and Significant X 2 – Y 0,319 0,239 0,102 2,734 1,995 0,334 51,049 Positive and Significant Source : Primary Data Processed 1. First Hypothesis The first hypothesis states that there is a positive influence of Moving Class Implementation on Student s’ Learning Motivation of Grade XI Social Sciences Program SMA Negeri 1 Cilacap Academic Year of 20132014. After empulate the simple linear correlation analysis with SPSS Statistics 17.0 for Windows, obtained the test results with a simple regression of the one predictor r x1y of 0.325. To determine whether these influence or not is by compare the r emp score with r table at significance level of 5 and n = 68 is equal to 0.239. The correlation coefficient results r x1y showed that r emp is greater than r table 0.325 0.239, so there is an influence of Moving Class Implementation on Students’ Learning Motivation in Accounting Learning of Grade XI Social Sciences Program SMA Negeri 1 Cilacap academic year of 20132014. To determine the Influence significances, then used the T-test. After the T-test were done, obtained the T emp of 2.787. It was greater than T table at significance level of 5 and n = 68 at the amount of 1.995; so the t emp is greater than T table 2.787 1.995. It shows that there is an influence of Moving Class Implementation on Student s’ Learning Motivation in Accounting Learning of Grade XI Social Sciences SMA Negeri 1 Cilacap academic year of 20132014. The results of the correlation coefficient r x1y at the amount of 0.325 is greater than the r table of 0.239; it can be said the first hypothesis is accepted. So the the results of this study are the Moving Class Implementation has a positive influence to the Student s’ Learning Motivation in Accounting Learning of Grade XI Social Sciences SMA Negeri 1 Cilacap academic year of 20132014. The coefficient of determination r 2 x1y amounted to 0.105; means that the Moving Class Implementation is able to influence 10.5 change in Students’ Learning Motivation in Accounting Learning. It shows that there is still 89.5 factor or other variable that influence Student s’ Learning Motivation in Accounting Learning beside the Moving Class Implementation. Regression model obtained by using SPSS Statistics 17.0 For Windows that is formed from the influence of Moving Class Implementation to the Students’ Learning Motivation in Accounting is : Y = 0.457X 1 +49.267 The meaning of the equation Y = 0.457 +49.267 X1 is the regression coefficient of Moving Class Implementation variable X 1 at the amount of 0.457; it means that if the Moving Class Implementation is increases by 1, the