Monthly Progress Report August 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 22
Packages No. 2 : Padang Sawah Sp. Empat Including Air Gadang Bridge During the month, there were signs of slight improvement as the Contractor was able to reduce the
slippage from -7.80
the previous month to -6.78
this month.
ANNEX P-2 Executive Summary Report present a more detailed status of the Contract Package. Package No. 3 : Manggopoh Padang Sawah
Although the current slippage of -7.26
this month, is still manageable at the moment but the delayed works are also leading to a downward trend from
-5.00 the previous month. Reason for
this delay is the minimal work accomplished on the general and drainage items. Work activities shall be closely supervised and monitored in order that the delayed works could be
reduced or attain an ahead of schedule progress in the coming month.
A more detailed status of the project progress are shown in ANNEX P-3 Executive Summary Report .
Package No. 4 : Ipuh Bantal The current status of this contract package is similar with that of Package No. 1 wherein the
negative slippage of -11.98
incurred last month further slipped down to -14.36
as of end of this reporting month.
The actual progress of 1,45
since the project started eight 8 months ago is of much concern than the slippage. Simply looking at the percentage of work accomplished, it seems that the project is not
moving forward.
Shown in ANNEX P-4 Executive Summary Report are the current problem and actions to be taken
to attain substantial progress in order to catch-up with the schedule. For contract packages under AWP-2 and AWP-3 which have a combined total of 17 Packages, a brief
summary of the actual activities and status as of this reporting period are presented in Table 1.1, page 6 of this Report.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and reporting based
on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
The Draft Final Quality Assurance Manual had been submitted on May 5, 2014 by CTC to PMU for further review and approval. Likewise, a copy of the Draft Final Quality Assurance Manual was
furnished to the Design Supervision Consultant for provisional reference for quality requirements of the projects.
As of this writing, DSC have not submitted any Quarterly Summary Quality Report to CTC. Letter from CTC to DSC was issued on July 23, 2014 regarding timely submittal of the Reports.
Monthly Progress Report August 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 23
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows:
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as such requires an
AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. SPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
All the twenty one 21 packages require environmental impact investigations. There are a total of fourty one 41 studies required, twenty 20 for environmental impact investigations and twenty
one 21 for social studies.
The twenty 20 environmental studies need the approval of the Environmental Agency BLH with five 5 of the studies AMDALEIA to be approved by World Bank WB.
While the twenty one 21 social studies SLARAP and LARAP require the approval of World Bank prior to implementation.
As of end of this reporting period August 2014, nineteen 19 environmental impact studies has been approved by BLH, while all of the five 5 studies that requires World Bank approval, Bank
already issued No Objection Letter NOL. The remaining one 1 environmental impact studies UKL- UPL for Packages No. 4 Ipuh-Bantal is currently under preparation.
For the social studies , twelve 12 of the twenty one 21 studies were already given No Objection Letter from the World Bank WB.
Details of sub-projects that require environmental and social safeguards and progress are shown in Appendix E.
Presented below in a tabulated format is the current status of the environmental and social studies.
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
11 AMDAL x 1
UKLUPL x 2 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 1 AMDAL 1
UKLUPL 4 SPPL
1 EIA, NOL Issued by WB
4 Full LARAP
Approved NOL issued by WB LARAP and
AMDAL paket 117, except for SPPL
AWP-2 9
17 4 UKLUPL
1 Simple 1 one Study AMDAL
