Monthly Progress Report May 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 19
Table 4.1
Program Contract
Package
Contractor Name of
Road Province
Contract Signed
Notice to
Proceed Contract
Time
AWP-1 1
Jaya Konstruksi
Manggala Pratama Tbk
Biha - Krui Lampung
Nov 25, 2013
Jan 8, 2014
640 CD
2 Jaya
Konstruksi Manggala
Pratama Tbk Padang
Sawah – Sp. Empat
including Air Gadang
West Sumatera
Dec 6, 2013
Jan 6, 2014
730 CD
3 Jaya
Konstruksi Manggala
Pratama Tbk Manggopoh
– Padang Sawah
West Sumatera
Dec 6, 2013
Jan 6, 2014
730 CD
4 PT. Waskita
Karya and PT. Mulya
Turangga JO Ipuh -
Bantal Bengkulu
Nov 14, 2013
Jan 10, 2014
730 CD
4.4 Civil Works Progress
As of the end of this reporting month, all the 4 contractors are still in the process of mobilization. Other activities done during this month were setting up of laboratory testing
building, staking out and repair and restoration of deteriorated existing pavements, roadway excavation, embankment formation, construction of stone masonry side ditches and other
minor works. Progress status of the four 4 on-going civil work contract as of this reporting period are shown in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2
Program Contract
Package
Contractor Name of
Road Target
Progress Schedule
Ending May 2014
Actual Progress
Accomplis hed
Slippage
AWP-1 1
Jaya Konstruksi Manggala
Pratama Tbk Biha - Krui
11.11 2.93
- 8.12
2 Jaya Konstruksi
Manggala Pratama Tbk
Padang Sawah –
Sp.Empat incl.Air
Gadang Brd
7.17 3.85
- 3.32
3 Jaya Konstruksi
Manggala Pratama Tbk
Manggopo h – Padang
Sawah
4.37 2.78
- 1.59
4 PT. Waskita
Karya and PT. Mulya Turangga
JO Ipuh -
Bantal
6.03 0.56
- 5.47
Monthly Progress Report May 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 20
It is to note that Contract Package No. 1 Biha – Krui is currently at an alarming stage with respect to work progress due to the considerable negative slippage -8,12 as of and of
May 2014 At the rate the Contractor execute the works, it is expected that by next month the delay will
slip further to the -10 mark if no realistic action plan or catch up schedule is implemented. It is presumed that the Design Supervision Consultant have done a concrete action to
address the Contractor’s progress problem. CTC drew the attention of DSC concerning what remedial measures to be imposed in the
coming month in order to catch up with the schedule. CTC requested copy of any action plan agreed, but up to this writing, DSC never replied to CTC’s communication.
For Contract Package No.4 Ipuh – Bantal, there was a big increase in the negative slippage of -5,47 as compared with a negligible delay of -0,61 in the previous month. To
catch up with the schedule, a show-cause meeting attended by representatives from DSC, Contractors and the Implementing Agency was held, mainly to address the Contractor’s
progress schedule. As the accumulated delay is still in the manageable level, CTC suggested that the action
plans proposed by the Contractors during Show Cause Meeting SCM shall be strictly implemented and closely monitored by the DSC Field Team with actual implementation
report and progress be copied to this office.
As the Contractors were still in the mobilization stage, most of the delay incurred were attributed to difficulty in locating suitable base camps and quarry sites of unlimited quantities.
For contract packages under AWP-2 and AWP-3 which have a combined total of 17 packages, a brief summary of the actual activities and status as of this reporting period are
presented in Table 1.1, page 5 of this Report.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and
reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their
supervision procedures.
The Draft Final Quality Assurance Manual had been submitted on May 5, 2014 by CTC to PMU for further review and approval. Likewise, a copy of the Draft Final Quality Assurance
manual was furnished to the Design Supervision Consultant for provisional reference for quality requirements of the projects.
