Monthly Progress Report May 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 20
It is to note that Contract Package No. 1 Biha – Krui is currently at an alarming stage with respect to work progress due to the considerable negative slippage -8,12 as of and of
May 2014 At the rate the Contractor execute the works, it is expected that by next month the delay will
slip further to the -10 mark if no realistic action plan or catch up schedule is implemented. It is presumed that the Design Supervision Consultant have done a concrete action to
address the Contractor’s progress problem. CTC drew the attention of DSC concerning what remedial measures to be imposed in the
coming month in order to catch up with the schedule. CTC requested copy of any action plan agreed, but up to this writing, DSC never replied to CTC’s communication.
For Contract Package No.4 Ipuh – Bantal, there was a big increase in the negative slippage of -5,47 as compared with a negligible delay of -0,61 in the previous month. To
catch up with the schedule, a show-cause meeting attended by representatives from DSC, Contractors and the Implementing Agency was held, mainly to address the Contractor’s
progress schedule. As the accumulated delay is still in the manageable level, CTC suggested that the action
plans proposed by the Contractors during Show Cause Meeting SCM shall be strictly implemented and closely monitored by the DSC Field Team with actual implementation
report and progress be copied to this office.
As the Contractors were still in the mobilization stage, most of the delay incurred were attributed to difficulty in locating suitable base camps and quarry sites of unlimited quantities.
For contract packages under AWP-2 and AWP-3 which have a combined total of 17 packages, a brief summary of the actual activities and status as of this reporting period are
presented in Table 1.1, page 5 of this Report.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and
reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their
supervision procedures.
The Draft Final Quality Assurance Manual had been submitted on May 5, 2014 by CTC to PMU for further review and approval. Likewise, a copy of the Draft Final Quality Assurance
manual was furnished to the Design Supervision Consultant for provisional reference for quality requirements of the projects.
Monthly Progress Report May 2014
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 21
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows :
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as
such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL
study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. SPPL or Standard operational procedures SOP or SKPPL are
used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguard are given in Appendix E and the following table provides a summary of the work involved in the 21 WINRIP
packages.
All the 21 packages require environmental impact investigation. All 39 studies 18 environmental studies need approval by Environmental Agency BLH. And 21 social
studies SLARAP and LARAP require the approval of the World Bank. Up to the end of May 2014 17of 18 packages 90 has received BLH approval then the current have 12 of
21social studies or 57 has received approval from the World Bank.
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 AMDAL x 1
UKLUPL x 2 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 1 AMDAL
1 UKLUPL 4 SPPL
4 Full LARAP
Approved – NOL issued by WB
LARAP and AMDAL paket 117, except
for SPPL
AWP-2 8
17 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 8 4 UKLUPL
4 AMDAL
1 SLARAP
1 one Study AMDAL for threes packages,
are Packages No.7, 12 and 14 packages
on AWP2 AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages, are
Packages No.11 16. packages on
AWP2 AWP3.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAPx 8
AMDAL Study x AMDAL OK
= paket No.1 17
AWP1 2
Full LARAP Approved – NOL
issued by WB include AMDAL except for
