Study Type Data and Data Sources

The first one is used to assess the interpreting in terms of accuracy and the second one is in terms of acceptability. The first one, the Accuracy Assessment Scoring System, is shown in Table 3. Table 3. The Accuracy Assessment Scoring System adapted from Nababan, Nuraeni, and Sumardiono, 2012: 50 Translation Criterion Score Explanation Accurate 3 The semantic content of the message in the source expression SE is accurately conveyed into target expression TE; there is no meaning distortion. Less Accurate 2 Most of the semantic content of the message in the source expression SE is accurately conveyed into target expression TE; however, there are some meaning distortions, meaning additions, or meaning omissions. Inaccurate 1 The semantic content of the message in the source expression SE is inaccurately conveyed into target expression TE or is deleted. In Table 3, there are some accuracy parameters used as the guidelines for the respondents to evaluate the interpreting accuracy. Here, the accuracy is classified into three levels: accurate score 3, less accurate score 2, and inaccurate score 1. The second parameter, the Acceptability Assessment Scoring System, is presented in Table 4. Table 4. The Acceptability Assessment Scoring System adapted from Nababan, Nuraeni, and Sumardiono, 2012: 51 Translation Criterion Score Explanation Acceptable 3 The interpreting sounds natural; the technical terms used by the interpreter sound familiar to the listeners; the phrase, clause, or sentence used by the interpreter is in accordance with the rules of the target language TL. Less Acceptable 2 Generally, interpreting sounds natural; however, there are some grammatical mistakes. Unacceptable 1 The interpreting sounds unnatural or sounds as a translation; there are some unfamiliar technical terms; the phrase, clause, or sentence used by the interpreter is not in accordance with the rules of the target language TL. In Table 4, there are some acceptability parameters used as the guidelines for the respondents to evaluate the interpreting acceptability. Here, the acceptability is classified into three levels: acceptable score 3, less acceptable score 2, and unacceptable score 1.

D. Data Collection Technique

The data collection technique in this research consists of several steps as follows. 1. The researcher watched the video of the thirteenth topic of Barbara O’Neil’s Seminar Kesehatan entitled Rewiring the Brain.