Suggestions The analgesic effect of in20Eur20J20 Pain.pdf .

Damayanti 2012 also states the same RESULTS thing that self-efficacy enhancing Patients withtype 2 diabetes mellitus intervention program in DM patients,This program increase self-efficacy patient to do self-care. SEEIP is one the techniques of identification is Self Efficacy Table1. Differences Self Efficacy type 2 diabetes patients are before and after treatment to treatment group learning to improve self-efficacy to and control group of Diabetes patients who adopted the cognitive theory group in BPJS branch Kediri, of social social cognitive theory, SCT proposed by Bandura comes from four Kediri,District in 2015. April-May main sources of influence, among other Treatment Control things: 1 performance accomplishments, 2 vicarious experience 3 verbal persuasion, 4 somatic and emotional Variabel n = 17 M p SD n = 17 M P SD state Bandura, 1997. Meanwhile, to Self Efficacy DMSES support awareness of himself and others Pre –Post 1 -21,706 ,000 -,029 ,868 we add model of caring by Jean Watson 12,572 ,717 with 10 caritasnya values of humanity, trust-hope, sensitivity terdahapyourself and others, a relationship of trust and Pre – Post 2 Post 1 – Post 2 -28,382 13,563 -6,676 ,000 ,000 -,235 1,120 -,206 ,399 ,130 mutual help, expression of positive and 4,334 ,532 negative, systematic problem solving Self Efficacy PTES methods, teaching and learning through Pre – Post 1 -25,471 ,000 ,294 ,332 interpersonal relationships, support, 16,164 1,213 protection, mental, physical, social, Pre – Post 2 -27,000 ,000 ,118 ,707 cultural and spiritual environment, human 15,996 1,269 needs and the strength of the existential Post 1 – Post 2 -1,529 ,001 -,176 ,548 phenomenological Alligood, 2014 1,463 1,185 METHODS Table1. to refer in treatment groups show Design research uses quasi- that Self EfficacyDMSES PTES has a experimental, by the experimental group were given intervention based SEEIP Caring, while control group received routine maintenance carried out by doctors and nurses. Samples were some participants Prolanis Chronic Disease Management Program amounted to 17 people chosen by simple random p value is 0.000, α0.05, its which means that any significant changes before and after SEEIP based Caring. In contrast to control group showed that Self Efficacy DMSES PTES has a p value greater with α0.05, which means are not change before and after SEEIP based Caring. sampling. SEEIP-based independent variable is the dependent variable is Caring and Self - Efficacy Patient DM Type 2. Data were collected using a questionnaire DMSES and PTES, then analyzed using paired t-test, independent t- test, while confounding variables using multiple linear regression. 526