174 indicates that idea projection has paratactic idea projection and hypotactic idea
projection as in the followings.
4.2.2.1 Paratactic Idea
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that the paratactic idea projection has only one pattern, i.e., 1 “β as in the
followings.
1 Pattern:1 “β Data 6 01:28
Clause: 1martangiangma hita, “βasa anggiat gabe keluarga namarbahagia nasida
Clause 1: martangiangma hita
Clause 2: asa anggiat gabe keluarga namarbahagia nasida
Universitas Sumatera Utara
175 The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the
pattern of its logical meaning in this text is 1 „β. It is a hypotactic idea proposition projection. 1 as an independent projecting clause with a mental process functions
as the modifier. „β as an independent projected idea proposition clause with a relational process functions as the head. Here 1 projects „β. So 1 „β means that 1
as an independent projecting clause with a mental process functions to project „β as an independent idea proposition clause in a paratactic idea proposition
projection.
4.2.2.2 Hypotactic Idea
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that the hypotactic idea proj ection has only three patterns, i.e., α „ , α
1 + β
+
3
, and „α as in the followings.
1 Pattern 1: α „ Data 9 01:5.5
Clause: α martangiang hita tu Debata, „ asa dipasaut sude angka nasinangkapan ni
rohanta Clause 1:
martangiang hita tu Debata
Universitas Sumatera Utara
176
Clause 2: asa dipasaut sude angka nasinangkapan ni rohanta
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the pattern of its logical meaning in this text is α . It is a hypotactic idea: projection
α as an independent projecting clause with a mental process functions as the modifier. as a dependent projected idea: projection clause with a mental process
functions as the head. Here α projects . So α means that α as an independent projecting clause with a mental process fun
ctions to project as a dependent idea projection clause in a paratactic idea: projection.
β Pattern β: α 1 + β
+ γ Data 3 00:41
Clause: αmauliate ma parjolo tapasahat tu amanta Debata jahoba, 1siala dibagasan
sadariondi ho do da naung manjalo pasu- pasu parbagasan,+ β
boru nami ima parumaen mu + γdohot di anak mu imada helanami
Clause 1:
Universitas Sumatera Utara
177 mauliate ma parjolo tapasahat tu amanta Debata Jahoba
Clause 2: siala dibagasan sadarion
di ho do da naung manjalo pasu-pasu parbagasan
Clause 3: boru nami ima parumaen mu
Clause 4: dohot di anak mu imada helanami
Universitas Sumatera Utara
178
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the pattern of its logical meaning in this text is α 1
+ β + γ. It is a hypotactic idea:
projection. α as an independent projecting clause with a mental process functions as the modifier.
1
as a dependent projected idea proposition clause with a mental process functions as the head. β as a dependent projected idea proposition clause
with a relational functions as the modifier. γ as a dependent projected idea
proposition clause with a relational functions as the modifier. Here α projects 1 + β
+ γ. So α 1 + β
+ γ means that α as an independent projecting clause with a mental process projects 1
+ β +
γ as three dependent idea proposition clauses in a hypotactic idea proposition projection.
γ Pattern γ: „α Data 160 03:00
Clause: sian natarparsinta nasaleleng on, „α na ingkon jomolo ma nian siangkangan, asa
sianggian Clause 1:
sian natarpasinta nasaleleng on
Universitas Sumatera Utara
179
Clause 2: na ingkon jomolo ma nian siangkangan asa sianggian
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the pattern of its logical meaning in this text is
„
α. It is a hypotactic idea proposition projection. as a dependent projecting clause with a mental process functions as
the modifier. „α as an independent projected idea proposition clause with a relational process functions as the head. Here projects „α. So „α means that
as a dependent projecting clause with a mental process projects „α as an
independent idea proposition clauses in a hypotactic idea proposition projection.
4.2.3 Idea: Proposition
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that idea proposition has paratactic idea proposition and hypotactic idea proposition as in the followings.
4.2.3.1 Paratactic Idea: Proposition
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic
Universitas Sumatera Utara
180 relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that the paratactic idea proposition has two patterns, i.e., 1 ‟β, „1 β, and 1 „β as in the followings.
1 Pattern 1: 1 ‟β Data 77 01:32
Clause: 1pos roha muna, ‟βsai diramoti ma hamu di parkarejoan muna
Clause 1: pos roha muna
Clause 2: sai diramoti ma hamu di parkarejoan muna
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the pattern of its logical meaning in this text i
s 1 „β. It is a pratactic idea proposition projection. 1as an independent projecting clause with a mental process functions
as the modifier. „β as an independent projected idea proposition clause with a mental process functions as the head. Here 1 projects
„β. So 1 „β means that 1 as
Universitas Sumatera Utara
181 anindependent projecting clause with a mental process projects „β as an
independent idea proposition clauses with a mental process in a paratactic idea proposition projection.
β Pattern β: „1 β Data 87 02:13
Clause: „1burju-burju ma ho tu simatuam on 2pos rohangku
Clause 1: burju-burju ma ho tu simatuamu on
Clause 2: pos rohangku
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the pattern of its logical meaning in this text is „1 β. It is a paratactic idea proposition
projection. „1as an independent projected idea proposition cause with a relational process functions as the head. 2 as an independent projecting clause with a mental
process functions as the modifier. Here 1 projects „β. So „1 β means that „1 as an
Universitas Sumatera Utara
182 independent projected idea proposition clause with a relational process is
projected by 2 as an independent projecting clauses with a mental process in a paratactic idea proposition.
γ Pattern 1: 1 „β Data 83 01: 56
Clause: 1pos rohangku,
„βdonganmu gabe ma on, boru, sidabutar on Clause 1:
pos rohangku
Clause 2: donganmu gabe ma on, boru, sidabutar on
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates the pattern of its logical meaning in this text is 1 „β. It is a paratactic idea proposition
projection. 1as an independent projecting clause with a mental process functions as the modifier.
„β as an independent projected idea proposition clause with a relational process functions as the head. Here 1 projects „β. So 1 „β means that 1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
183 as an independent projecting clause with a mental process projects „β as an
independent idea proposition clause with a relational process in a paratactic idea proposition projection.
4.2.3.2 Hypotactic Idea: Proposition
