135 relationa
l process functions as an extended expansion “and”. +β as an independent clause with a relational process functions as an extending expansion “and”. +γ as
an independent clause with a relational process functions as an extending expansion “and”. +4 as an independent clause function as an extending expansion
“and”. Here 1 is extended by β, γ, and 4. So 1… +4 means that 1 is extended by +2which is extended by +3 which is extended by +4 in a paratactic extension
expansion.
4.1.β.β Extension “or”
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that the types of extension “or” only has the paratactic extension “or” as in the followings.
4.1.2.2.1 Par atactic Extension “or”
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that paratactic extension “or” has two patterns, i.e., as 1 +β and 1 +2 +3 in the followings.
1 Pattern 1 + 2 Data 117 08:54
Clause: 1mamben adat hamu +manang manggarar adat, dainang da
Clause 1:
Universitas Sumatera Utara
136 mamben adat hamu
Clause 2: manang manggarar adat, dainang da
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates that the pattern of its logical meaning is 1 +2. 1 as an independent clause with a relational
process functions as an extended expansion. +2 as an independent clause with a relational process functions as an extending “or” expansion. So 1 +β means that 1
as an independent clause is extended by 2 as independent clause extending 1.
2 Pattern 2: 1 +2 +3 Data 108 08:02
Clause: 1nang pe di Sidamanik hamu marsogot, +2manang na di porsea, +3manang na di
balige on Clause 1:
nang pe di Sidamanik hamu marsogot
Universitas Sumatera Utara
137
Clause 2: manang na di porsea
Clause 3: manang na di balige on
The logico-semantic relation analysis on the data above indicates that the patterns of the logical meanings its 1 +2 +3. 1 as an independent clause with a
relational process functions as an extended expansion. +2 as an elliptical independent clause with a relational process functions as an extending expansion
which is extended by +3. +3 as an elliptical independent clause with a relational process functions as an extending expansion. So 1 +2 +3 means that 1 as an
independent clause is extended by 2 and 3 as elliptical independent extensions “or” in a paratactic extension “or” expansion.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
138
4.1.β.γ Extension “but”
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that the types of extension “but” only has the paratactic extension “but” as in the followings.
4.1.β.γ.1. Paratactic Extension “but”
The analysis based on the transitivity system and the logico-semantic relation in the tactic system theories of SFG on the data of TBWS in this research
indicates that paratactic extension “but” has only one pattern, i.e., as 1 +β in the followings.
1 Pattern: 1 +2 Data 112 08:35
Clause: 1holan tu adat do boanon muna on ate, +2dang pola boanon muna on dohot tu
gareja Clause 1:
holan tu adat do boanon muna on ate
Clause 2: dang pola boanon muna on dohot tu gareja
Universitas Sumatera Utara
139
The logico-semantic relation on the data above indicates that the pattern of its logical meaning is 1 +2. 1 as an independent clause with a material process
functions as an extended expansion. +2 as an independent clause with a material process functions as an extending “but” expansion. Here 1 is extended by β. So1
+2 means that 1 as an independent clause is extended by 2 as an independent extension “but” modifier clause in a paratactic extension “but”.
4.1.3 Enhancement
