531
7.3.3.2 Complex Mixed Extension Head Pattern
The influence of the linguistic behavior of the ST into the linguistic behavior of the TT occurs in the complex mixed extension head patterns α1 +αβ
= , [1 +β] x[xγ 4 +5], α1 +αβ x , α1 +αβ x xαγ =α4, α1 +αβ xαγ x +α4 +α5 + α6 between the ST and TT. The linguistic behavior on both
the transitivity and logico-semantic relation system of the pattern of the ST remain the same in the TT. The influence of the linguistic behavior of the TT approaches
the linguistic behavior of the ST in the complex mixed extension head patterns.
7.3.3.3 Complex Mixed Enhancement Head Pattern
The influence of the linguistic behavior of the ST into the linguistic behavior of the TT occurs in the complex mixed enhancement head patterns x α
= , [x1 β] x[xγ 4 +5], 1 xβ +γ +4, α1 x[αβ +αγ = 1 + β + γ = ], x 1 α x β, and x α1 +αβ between the ST and TT. The linguistic behavior on both
the transitivity and logico-semantic relation system of the pattern of the ST remain the same in the TT. The influence of the linguistic behavior of the TT approaches
the linguistic behavior of the ST in the complex mixed enhancement head pattern.
7.3.3.4 Paratactic Complex Mixed Locution Head
The influence of the linguistic behavior of the ST into the linguistic behavior of the TT occurs in the paratactic complex mixed locution head patterns
“{[1 =β] x[xxγ 4 5 =6]}, x α1 “[αβ + αγ xα4 + α5], “α1 “[αβ + αγ xα4 xα5], and 1 “{[2 +3 x4 +5] =[6 =7] +[ 8 x9 x10] +[11 =12]
x[x13 +14 15 x16]} between the ST and TT. The linguistic behavior on both
Universitas Sumatera Utara
532 the transitivity and logico-semantic relation system of the pattern of the ST remain
the same in the TT. The influence of the linguistic behavior of the TT approaches the linguistic behavior of the ST in the paratactic complex mixed locution head.
7.3.3.5 Hypotactic Complex Mixed Locution Head Pattern
The influence of the linguistic behavior of the ST into the linguistic behavior of the TT occurs in the hypotactic complex mixed locution head patterns
1 xα1 “{[αβ = αγ] =[α4 x β =α5], α “α = , α1 “{[αβ + αγ] x[x α4 +α5 +α6 +α7 α7]}, α1”{[ αβ + αγ x α4] x[xx α5 α6 +α7]}, 1”{[β +γ]
x[x4 5 +6 +7 +8]}, α1 “{[αβ] x[αγ = 1 + β + β]}, and [α1 x ] “{[αβ] x[αγ +α4 +α5]} between the ST and TT. The linguistic behavior on
both the transitivity and logico-semantic relation system of the pattern of the ST remain the same in the TT. The influence of the linguistic behavior of the TT
approaches the linguistic behavior of the ST in the hypotactic complex mixed locution head.
7.4 Discussions
In this section, the discussion on the findings of the reseach conducted in this study focuses on three topics, they are the discussion on: 1. the finding on the
patterns of the logical meanings of the TBWS; 2. the functional equivalence of the patterns of the logical meanings between the ST and TT; and 3. the reasons why
the patterns of the logical meanings of the ST are represented in the TT as they are. The detail discussions on each of the three topics are given in the followings.
Universitas Sumatera Utara