Saran Persepsi guru dalam penerapan pendidikan lingkungan hidup di sekolah dasar sekitar hutan kawasan Gunung Salak Endah Kabupaten Bogor
91 Muntasib EKSH,
Masy’ud B, Hermawan R, Rushayati SB, Rachmawati E, Meilani R, Yudiarti Y, Rahayuningsih T. 2009. Laporan Akhir Penelitian
Strategis Aplikatif Penerapan Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup bagi Sekolah- sekolah di Sekitar Kawasan Hutan. Bogor: Departemen Konservasi
Sumberdaya Hutan dan Ekowisata Fakultas Kehutanan Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Neuman WL. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Ed ke-6. Boston, New York, San Fransisco, Mexico City,
Montreal, Toronto, London, Madrid, Munich, Paris, Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, Cape Town, Sydney: Allyn and Bacon Pearson Education, Inc.
Niemiec CP, Ryan RM. 2009. Autonomy, Competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice.
Theory and
Research in
Education 72:133-144.
http:www.psych.rochester.eduSDTdocuments2009_NiemiecRyan_TRE. pdf
[7 Des 2009] Nirarita ECh. 2003. Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup dalam Sekolah Formal. Di
dalam: Muntasib EKSH, Meilani R, editor. Model Pengembangan Pendidikan tentang Hutan dan Lingkungan Bagi Anak Sekolah. Prosiding
Workshop Model Pengembangan Pendidikan tentang Hutan dan Lingkungan bagi Anak Sekolah. Bogor: 24 Apr 2003. Bogor: Fakultas
Kehutanan Institut Pertanian Bogor, Pusat Bina Penyuluhan Kehutanan Departemen Kehutanan, dan The Nature Conservancy.
[NAAEE] North American Association for Environmental Education. 2004. Guidelines for The Preparation and Professional Development of
Environmental Educators.
Washington, DC:
NAAEE. http:www.naaee.org
[30 Nov 2009] Ofoegbu F. 2004. Teacher Motivation: a Factor for Classroom Effectiveness and
School Improvement in Nigeria. College Student Journal, 381:81-89. http:find.galegroup.comgtxstart.do?prodId=SPJ.SP01userGroupName=
ptn003 [31 Okt 2009]
[Pokja PKSDHL] Kelompok Kerja Pendidikan Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan dan Lingkungan. 1998. Perkembangan Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup di
Indonesia. Bogor: Kelompok Kerja Pendidikan Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan dan Lingkungan Jurusan Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan Fakultas
Kehutanan Institut Pertanian Bogor bekerjasama dengan Badan Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan BAPEDAL.
[RI] Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Republik Indonesia.
Robbins SP. 2003. Organizational Behavior. Ed ke-10. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Pearson Education International.
92 Robbins SP. 2005. Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Ed ke-8. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall Pearson Education International. Roth G, Assor A, Kanat-Maymon Y, Kaplan H. 2007. Autonomous Motivation
for Teching: How Self-Determined Teaching May Lead to Self-Determined Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 994:761-774
Ryan, RM. 1982. Control and Information in the Intrapersonal Sphere: An Extension of Cognitive Evaluation Theory. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology 43:450-461. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic
Definitions and New directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25:54-67.
http:www.psych.rochester.eduSDTdocuments2000_RyanDeci_IntExtDe fs.pdf [7
Des 2009] Santrock JW. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan. Ed ke-2. Tri Wibowo B.S.,
penerjemah. Jakarta: Kencana. Severin WJ, Tankard JW. 1979. Communication Theories: Origins, Methods,
Uses. New York: Hastings House, Publishers. Shavitt S, Brock TC, editor. 1994. Persuasion: Psychological Insights and
Perspectives. Boston, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, Singapore: Allyn and Bacon.
Sia AP. 1992. Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Perceived Efficacy in Teaching Environmental Education: A Preliminary Study. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the ECO-ED North American Association for Environmental Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 20 Okt 1992.
http:www.eric.gov.edu [29 Jan 2010]
Siagian SP. 2004. Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya. Cet ke-3. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Smith MK, Mergel B, Furse E, Carver JM, Hagwood S, Huitt WG. 2009. Teori Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran: Mengukur Kesuksesan Anda dalam Proses
Belajar Mengajar Bersama Psikolog Pendidikan Dunia. Saleh AQ, penerjemah. Yogyakarta: Mirza Media Pustaka.
Smith- Sebasto NJ. 2007. A Reinvestigation of Teacher’s Motivation Toward and
Perception of Residential Environmental Education: A Case Study of the New Jersey School of Conservation. The Journal of Environmental
Education 384:34-42. http:www.proquest.compqdweb
[18 Jun 2009] Spittle M, Jackson K, Casey M. 2009. Applying Self-Determination Theory to
Understand the Motivation for Becoming a Physical Education Teacher. Teaching
and Teacher
Education 25:190-197.
http:www.proquest.compqdweb [20 Jun 2009]
93 Sugiyono. 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Triandis HC. 1971. Attitude and Attitude Change. New York, London, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley Sons, Inc.
Vallerand RJ, Koestner R, Pelletier LG. 2008. Reflections on Self-Determination Theory. Canadian Psychology, 493:257-262.
Watt HMG, Richardson PW. 2008. Motivations, Perceptions and Aspiration Concerning Teaching as a Career for Different Types of Beginning
Teachers. Learning
and Instruction
18:408-428. http:www.proquest.compqdweb [21
Jul 2009] Wood JT. 2007. Interpersonal Communication: Everyday Encounters. Ed ke-5.
Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Analisis Faktor
Descrip tive Stati stics
4,3387 ,45069
31 2,7032
,57474 31
4,1161 ,40257
31 3,8968
,56064 31
3,1968 ,49765
31 4,4452
,59264 31
3,6935 ,38465
31 3,8710
,35326 31
Interest enjoy m ent Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance PressureTension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Mean Std. Dev iat ion
Analy sis N
Correlati on Matrix
a
1,000 ,007
,639 ,032
-,005 ,482
,105 ,129
,007 1,000
,062 ,340
,337 ,299
,392 -,211
,639 ,062
1,000 -,040
,082 ,503
,237 ,221
,032 ,340
-,040 1,000
,577 ,243
,334 ,015
-,005 ,337
,082 ,577
1,000 ,371
,380 -,198
,482 ,299
,503 ,243
,371 1,000
,545 -,060
,105 ,392
,237 ,334
,380 ,545
1,000 ,006
,129 -,211
,221 ,015
-,198 -,060
,006 1,000
,485 ,000
,432 ,489
,003 ,286
,245 ,485
,371 ,030
,032 ,051
,015 ,127
,000 ,371
,416 ,331
,002 ,099
,116 ,432
,030 ,416
,000 ,094
,033 ,469
,489 ,032
,331 ,000
,020 ,018
,143 ,003
,051 ,002
,094 ,020
,001 ,373
,286 ,015
,099 ,033
,018 ,001
,487 ,245
,127 ,116
,469 ,143
,373 ,487
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Correlation
Sig. 1-tailed Interest e
njoy ment Perceiv ed
Competence Ef f ort
Import ance Pressure
Tension Perceiv ed
Choice Value
Usef ulness Self -ef f icacy
ETOE
Determinant = ,085 a.
Lanjutan
Inverse of Correlation Matrix
1,987 ,113
-1,049 -,301
,374 -,717
,345 ,033
,113 1,351
-,082 -,303
-,043 -,127
-,337 ,279
-1,049 -,082
2,089 ,475
-,276 -,481
-,142 -,435
-,301 -,303
,475 1,741
-,941 ,004
-,186 -,341
,374 -,043
-,276 -,941
1,849 -,392
-,133 ,361
-,717 -,127
-,481 ,004
-,392 2,240
-,836 ,235
,345 -,337
-,142 -,186
-,133 -,836
1,699 -,168
,033 ,279
-,435 -,341
,361 ,235
-,168 1,242
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Interest e njoy ment
Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ort Import ance
Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice
Value Usef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
KMO and Bartl etts Test
,642 65,351
28 ,000
Kaiser-Mey er-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy .
Approx. Chi-Square df
Sig. Bart lett s Test of
Sphericity
Anti -image Matrices
,503 ,042
-,253 -,087
,102 -,161
,102 ,014
,042 ,740
-,029 -,129
-,017 -,042
-,147 ,166
-,253 -,029
,479 ,131
-,071 -,103
-,040 -,167
-,087 -,129
,131 ,574
-,292 ,001
-,063 -,157
,102 -,017
-,071 -,292
,541 -,095
-,042 ,157
-,161 -,042
-,103 ,001
-,095 ,446
-,220 ,084
,102 -,147
-,040 -,063
-,042 -,220
,588 -,080
,014 ,166
-,167 -,157
,157 ,084
-,080 ,805
,580
a
,069 -,515
-,162 ,195
-,340 ,188
,021 ,069
,778
a
-,049 -,197
-,027 -,073
-,223 ,216
-,515 -,049
,620
a
,249 -,141
-,222 -,075
-,270 -,162
-,197 ,249
,571
a
-,524 ,002
-,108 -,232
,195 -,027
-,141 -,524
,641
a
-,193 -,075
,238 -,340
-,073 -,222
,002 -,193
,723
a
-,428 ,141
,188 -,223
-,075 -,108
-,075 -,428
,717
a
-,116 ,021
,216 -,270
-,232 ,238
,141 -,116
,368
a
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Anti-image Cov ariance
Anti-image Correlation Interest e
njoy ment Perceiv ed
Competence Ef f ort
Importance Pressure
Tension Perceiv ed
Choice Value
Usef ulness Self -ef f icacy
ETOE
Measures of Sampling Adequacy MSA a.
Lanjutan
Communaliti es
1,000 ,732
1,000 ,508
1,000 ,782
1,000 ,735
1,000 ,651
1,000 ,757
1,000 ,550
1,000 ,899
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
Initial Extract ion
Extract ion Method: Principal Component Analy sis.
Total Variance Explained
2,761 34,518
34,518 2,761
34,518 34,518
2,333 29,160
29,160 1,850
23,122 57,640
1,850 23,122
57,640 2,138
26,726 55,887
1,003 12,533
70,172 1,003
12,533 70,172
1,143 14,286
70,172 ,758
9,477 79,649
,619 7,737
87,387 ,437
5,464 92,850
,317 3,961
96,811 ,255
3,189 100,000
Component 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Total
of Variance Cumulat iv e
Total of Variance
Cumulat iv e Total
of Variance Cumulat iv e
Initial Eigenv alues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis.
Lanjutan
Rotated Component Matrix
a
,850 ,593
,872 ,830
,796 ,717
,665 ,938
Interest enjoy ment Perceiv ed Competence
Ef f ortImportance Pressure Tension
Perceiv ed Choice ValueUsef ulness
Self -ef f icacy ETOE
1 2
3 Component
Extract ion Method: Principal Component Analy sis. Rotation Met hod: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
Rotation conv erged in 4 iterations. a.
Component Transformation Matrix
,788 ,605
-,114 -,531
,761 ,372
,312 -,232
,921 Component
1 2
3 1
2 3
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis. Rotation Met hod: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
Lampiran 2. Analisis Korelasi Spearman
Correlati ons
1,000 ,272
,076 -,212
-,011 -,058
-,081 -,012
. ,138
,686 ,252
,952 ,758
,666 ,950
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
,272 1,000
,207 -,144
-,061 ,441
-,091 -,200
,138 .
,263 ,440
,744 ,013
,628 ,281
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
,076 ,207
1,000 ,059
-,076 ,077
-,107 -,158
,686 ,263
. ,753
,684 ,679
,568 ,395
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
-,212 -,144
,059 1,000
,061 -,063
,187 ,114
,252 ,440
,753 .
,744 ,735
,315 ,542
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
-,011 -,061
-,076 ,061
1,000 ,190
,849 ,740
,952 ,744
,684 ,744
. ,307
,000 ,000
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
-,058 ,441
,077 -,063
,190 1,000
,171 ,094
,758 ,013
,679 ,735
,307 .
,357 ,614
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
-,081 -,091
-,107 ,187
,849 ,171
1,000 ,841
,666 ,628
,568 ,315
,000 ,357
. ,000
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
-,012 -,200
-,158 ,114
,740 ,094
,841 1,000
,950 ,281
,395 ,542
,000 ,614
,000 .
31 31
31 31
31 31
31 31
Correlation Coef f icient Sig. 2-tailed
N Correlation Coef f icient
Sig. 2-tailed N
Correlation Coef f icient Sig. 2-tailed
N Correlation Coef f icient
Sig. 2-tailed N
Correlation Coef f icient Sig. 2-tailed
N Correlation Coef f icient
Sig. 2-tailed N
Correlation Coef f icient Sig. 2-tailed
N Correlation Coef f icient
Sig. 2-tailed N
persepsi lingkungan Faktor1
Faktor2 Faktor3
Usia Pendidikan
Masa Kerja tahun Lama Mengajar tahun
Spearmans rho persepsi
lingkungan Faktor1
Faktor2 Faktor3
Usia Pendidikan
Masa Kerja tahun
Lama Mengajar
tahun
Correlation is signif icant at the 0.05 lev el 2-tailed. .
Correlation is signif icant at the 0.01 lev el 2-tailed. .
Lampiran 3. Uji Kruskal-Wallis
Descriptives
7 2,8557
1,51321 8
2,7500 1,89276
9 3,2600
1,54455 7
2,8100 ,37776
31 2,9355
1,41581 7
3,4400 ,38362
8 3,4675
,39633 9
3,1733 ,36373
7 3,4443
,32969 31
3,3706 ,37373
7 4,1871
,15510 8
4,3500 ,39666
9 4,3478
,45486 7
4,2671 ,54914
31 4,2939
,40193 7
3,7429 ,33594
8 4,0125
,35229 9
3,9111 ,30185
7 3,7857
,43370 31
3,8710 ,35326
Gn Sari 01 Gn Bunder 03
Gn Bunder 04 Gn Picung 06
Total Gn Sari 01
Gn Bunder 03 Gn Bunder 04
Gn Picung 06 Total
Gn Sari 01 Gn Bunder 03
Gn Bunder 04 Gn Picung 06
Total Gn Sari 01
Gn Bunder 03 Gn Bunder 04
Gn Picung 06 Total
persepsi lingkungan
Faktor1
Faktor2
Faktor3 N
Mean Std. Dev iat ion
Lanjutan
Ranks
7 16,79
8 15,63
9 17,11
7 14,21
31 7
18,43 8
17,75 9
11,67 7
17,14 31
7 12,43
8 18,13
9 17,28
7 15,50
31 7
11,64 8
19,38 9
17,78 7
14,21 31
Sekolah Gn Sari 01
Gn Bunder 03 Gn Bunder 04
Gn Picung 06 Total
Gn Sari 01 Gn Bunder 03
Gn Bunder 04 Gn Picung 06
Total Gn Sari 01
Gn Bunder 03 Gn Bunder 04
Gn Picung 06 Total
Gn Sari 01 Gn Bunder 03
Gn Bunder 04 Gn Picung 06
Total persepsi lingkungan
Faktor1
Faktor2
Faktor3 N
Mean Rank
Test Statistics