506
Table 2. The Summary of Results of Calculation Variant Analysis ANOVA Two The level Strip At
α = 0.05 significance
Sumber Variansi JK
db RJK
F
hitung
F
tabel
α = 0,05 α = 0,01
Between Columns A1 A2
2587,94 1
2587,94 18,03
4,16 7,52
Between the Lines B1 B2 B3 B4
2339,97 3
779,99 5,43
2,91 4,49
Interaction of A x B 2225,17
3 741,72
5,17 2,91
4,49 Within
4450,36 31
143,56 Total
11603,44 38
Remarks: db = degrees of freedom, JK = Sum of Squares, RJK = Mean Sum of Squares, α =
Level of Significance, A = Method Storytelling, B = Parenting, Significant, Highly Significant
Based on the calculation results of the ANOVA-2 line above, obtained some of the findings related to the research hypotheses and can be summarized as follows:
1. Differences Between Emotional Intelligence Group Provided Storytelling Method of
Treatment Using Hand Puppet With a Given Group Method of Treatment Storytelling Using Book A1A2
Based on the calculation above table Anova two paths to a source of variance between A1A2 column of F
hitung
obtained at 18.03 and F
tabel
of 4.16 at the significance level α of 0.05 is seen that of F
hitung
is greater than F
tabel
F
h
F
t
this means null hypothesis H
o
is rejected and the alternative hypothesis H
1
is accepted. Concluded that there are differences in emotional intelligence between group provided
storytelling method of treatment using hand puppet with a given group method of treatment storytelling using book. The differences are also apparent when viewed from the average
where μ A1 = 104.35 and μ A2 = 88.05, which means μ A1 μ A2. This suggests that
emotional intelligence group treated with the method of storytelling using hand puppets significantly higher emotional intelligence than the group treated with the method of
storytelling using the book.
2. Differences in Emotional Intelligence Based Child Parenting Style The Authoritative,
Authoritarian, Permissive Indulgent, and Permissive Indifferent B1B2B3B4
Based on the calculation above table Anova two paths to a source of variance between lines obtained B1B2B3B4 by F
hitung
5.43 and F
tabel
2.91 at the significance level α of 0.05 is seen that of F
hitung
is greater than F
tabel
F
h
F
t
this means that the null hypothesis H
o
is rejected and the alternative hypothesis H
1
is accepted. Concluded that there are differences in childrens emotional intelligence based
parenting style were authoritative, authoritarian, permissive indulgent, and permissive indifferent. The differences are also apparent when seen from the mean number of group
emotional intelligence before treated with storytelling using hand puppets and that before treated with storytelling using books where μ B1 = 154.2, μ B2= 152.67, μ B3 = 153.5 and μ
B4 = 144 which means that μ B1 μ B2, μ B3, and μ B4. This shows that a group of authoritative parenting style significantly influence the emotional intelligence of children than
parenting style authoritarian, permissive indulgent, and permissive indifferent.
507
3. There Effect of Interaction Between Storytelling Learning Method With The
