Conclussion Acknowledgements References Analisis 8OHdG dengan TLC-Spektrofotodensitometri

136 137 major contribution of VAM infection Gautam Shrestha, 2009 ; Kumar et al., 2002. The VAM colonization increased initially up to 45 days but decreased thereafter. The positive mycorrhizal response at early seedling stage, may be due to the increase in root development. Bhattacharya et al. 2000, working on the arbuscular mycorrhizal dependence of Eucalyptus tereticornis, found both negative and positive response of VAM fungi inoculation and concluded that E. tereticornis may not be an arbuscular mycorrhizadependent plant at early developmental stage, although it is infected by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi freely, improving its phosphorus acquisition eficiency in low phosphorus soil. Inluence of VAM fungi Glomus invermaium and sheathing ECM ectomycorrhiza Descolea maculata on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus have been reported by De Olieviera et al. 1999a,b. Earlier studies by Kumar et al. 2002 and Hazarika et al. 1999 also found Glomus mosseae inoculation to have maximum effect on the growth of chickpea plants. Rajeshwari et al. 2001 also reported that seedling growth and vigor of casuarinas Casuarina equisetifolia raised in polybags was greater after inoculating nursery soil mixture with cultures of Glomus fasciculatum, Glomus mosseae and Glomus etunicatum,and that Glomus fasciculatum was more eficient. The production of large number of VAM fungi in soil-based innoculla could be attributed to rapid sprouting from extracellular and intracellular hyphae in the soil and root inoculum. The root colonization by mycorrhiza was directly related to nutrient uptake by plants. The plants with highest mycorrhizal root colonization had larger number of mycorrhizal spores in soil. Dodd and Thompson 1994 also observed the similar results while using the soil-based VAM inoculum. Shoot length and fresh weight were more in 75 spores of Glomus sp-treated A. occidentale seedlings. According to Rani et al. 1999 recorder greater height and fresh weight in plant species treated Glomus sp, it is likely that Glomus species produce growth hormones which result in better growth of the shoots Rani et al. 1999. Thus, VAM fungi of Glomus sp have a potential for utilisation to produce high quality seedlings of A. occidentale ensuring better survival and improved growth in the nurseries.

4. Conclussion

The usage of native VAM spores Glomus sp have signiicant role to the growth of Cashew nut A.occidentale L. seedlings cultivated in Green house. The signiicant result on the 60 days of cashew seedlings was 75 spore of VAM fungi combined with 20 grams of manure

5. Acknowledgements

Thanks to Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic Indonesia and University of Udayana Bali grant of Hibah Udayanan 2012 for providing inancial support and extending essential facilities to carry out this research work.

6. References

[1] Al-Zalzaleh, Hani , A. Majid, Anu Ray Mathew, 2009. VAM Inoculation for Selected Ornamental Plants in Bioremediated and Agricultural Soils. European Journal of Scientiic Research.254.559-566 [2] Bagyaraj, D.J. 1992. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza: Application in agriculture. Methods in Microbiology. 24: 360-373. [3] Bhattacharya, P.M., Misra, D., Saha, J. and Chaudhari, S. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.: How real is it? Mycorrhiza News 123: 11-15. [4] Brundrett, M., N. Bougher, B. Dell,. T. Grove, N. Malajczuk. 2008. working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture. ACIAR Monograph 32. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. [5] Chalimah, S., Muhadiono, L. Aznam, S. Haran, N., Toruan-Mathius. 2007. Propagation of Gigaspora sp and Acaulospora by pot culture in green house. Biodiversitas. 7412-19. [6] Danesh, Y.R.; E.M. Goltapeh; A. Alizadek; A. Varma and K.G. Mukerjii. 2007. Arbuscular- Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Alfalfa Rhizosphere in Iran. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 25: 574-580 [7] De Olieviera, V.L., Thomson, B.D. and Last, F.T. 1998-1999a. Eucalypt seedlings and their mycorrhizas: components of growth and some aspects of root eficiency. Kavaka 26 27: 71-80. [8] De Olieviera, V.L., Thomson, B.D. and Last, F.T. 1998-1999b. Eucalypt seedlings and their mycorrhizas: the early stages of development after substrate inoculations with arbuscular and or sheathing ectomycorrhizal fungi. Kavaka 26 27: 81-89. [9] Dodd, J.C. and Thompson, B.D. 1994. The screening and selection of inoculant arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal fungi. pages 149-158, In: Robson, A.D., Abott, L.K. and Malajczuk, N. Editors [10] Douds Jr., D.D., G. Nagahashi, P.R. Hepperly. 2010. On-farm production of inoculum of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and assessment of diluent of compost for inoculum production.. Bioresource Technology 101. 2326-2330 [11] Gautam Shrestha, Geeta Shrestha Vaidya and Binayak P. Rajbhandari1, 2009. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza in the Productivity of Maize and Fingermillet Relay Cropping System. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology 10. 51-55 [12] Gill, T.S., Singh, R.S. and Kaur, J. 2002. Comparison of four arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for root colonization, spore population and plant growth response in chickpea. Indian Phytopathology 552:210-213. [13] Giovannetti, M. and Sbrana, C. 1998. Meeting a non-host: The behaviour of AM fungi. Mycorrhiza 83: 123-130. [14] Kumar, R., Jalali, B.L. Chand, H. 2002. Inluence of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and nutrient uptake in chickpea. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 32 1: 11-15. [15] Lapeyrie, F.F. and Chilvers, G.A. 1985. An endomycorrhiza-ectomycorrhiza succession associated with enhanced growth by Eucalyptus dumosa seedlings planted in calcareous soils. The New Phytologist. 1001: 93-104. [16] Rajeshwari, E., Latha, T.K.S., Vanangamudi, K., Selvan, K.A. and Narayanan, R. 2001. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal and phosphorus on seedling growth of Casuarina equisetifolia. Indian Phytopathalogy 541: 85-87. [17] Rani, P., Aggarwal, A. and Mehrotra, R.S. 1999. Growth responses in Acacia nilotica inoculated with VAM fungi Glomus mosseae, Rhizobium species and Trichoderma harzianum. Indian Phytopathology 522: 151-153. 138 139 Bentuk-Bentuk Peraturan Gubernur Di Provinsi Bali Ni Luh Gede Astariyani 1 1 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana E-mail : Astariyani99yahoo.com Abstrak This scientiic work entitled “Forms of Governor Rule in the province of Bali” discusses the two 2 main topics, namely: 1 What does “carry” and “the power” in the sense that there are strict orders to make regulations implementing or without irm orders yet substance requires implementing regulations?, and 2 Does the Governor Regulation as a form of law enforcement and the power of legislation can be categorized legislation or regulatory policies?. Discussion conducted using legal research methods, in the sense bersumberkan on legal materials and analyzed by using tools of legal analysis. Discussion to a conclusion. First, the meaning of “implement” and “the power” can mean a strict order to make the implementation of the regulations or orders without expressly require implementing regulations but substance. Second, the Governor Rule as a form of execution of the power of local regulations and legislation are higher, which in the local regulations and the legislation is concerned the command speciied explicitly regulate the delegation of authority to the governor legislation, the regulatory the governor appeared in the igure of the legislation. Regulation governor may also appear in the igure of regulatory policy, the governor rule is a rule made by the oficials of the state administration by the use FreiesErmessen without constituted by the delegation of the authority to regulate. Keywords: Regulation of the Governor, Governor.

I. Pendahuluan 1. Latar belakang.

Kewenangan delegasi delegatie van wetgevingsbevoegdheid adalah pelimpahan kewenangan membentuk peraturan perundang-undangan yang dilakukan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi kepada peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih rendah. Pasal 146 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, mengatur bahwa untuk melaksanakan Perda dan atas kuasa peraturan perundang- undangan, Kepala Daerah menetapkan peraturan Kepala Daerah dan atau Keputusan Kepala Daerah. Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang- undangan selanjutnya disebut Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 , dikenal dua kelompok peraturan perundang-undangan.Yang pertama adalah peraturan perundang-undangan di dalam hierarkhi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 7 ayat 1 antara lain : a. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 ; b. Ketetapan Majelis permusyawatan Rakyat ; c. Undang- UndangPeraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang ;d. Peraturan Pemerintah ; e. Peraturan Presiden ; f. Peraturan Daerah Provinsi; dan g.Peraturan Daerah KabupatenKota. Pasal 8 ayat 2 yang mengatur bahwa Peraturan perundang-undangan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat 1, diakui keberadaannya sepanjang diperintahkan oleh peraturan perundang- undangan yang lebih tinggi atau dibentuk berdasarkan kewenangan. Tolak ukur diakuinya keberadaan peraturan perundang-undangan di luar hierarkhi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 8 ayat 2 adalah “sepanjang diperintahkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi atau dibentuk berdasarkan kewenangan “. Tanpa adanya perintah tersebut, maka peraturan- peraturan itu tidak dapat diakui sebagai peraturan perundang-undangan yang karenanya tidak dapat mengikat secara umum. Peraturan-peraturan tersebut di dalam teori perundang-undangan dapat dikategorikan Peraturan Kebijakan Beleidsregel, Policy rule, atau Pseduwetgeving [1]. Penggunaan kata “melaksanakan“ dalam Pasal 146 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 mempunyai makna ada perintah tegas atau tanpa perintah tegas namun substansi memerlukan peraturan pelaksanaan. Kata “atas kuasa” dalam Pasal 146 ayat 1 mempunyai makna kewenangan atas sesuatu atau untuk menentukan, dalam konteks ini menunjukkan penjabaran lebih lanjut peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi, yang menentukan sebagai materi muatan Peraturan Daerah, maka harus terlebih dahulu diatur dalam Peraturan Daerah.Memperhatikan kata “melaksanakan“ dan kata “atas kuasa” bermakna : a. Ketidakjelasan mengenai adanya perintah dari pasal tersebut akan memberikan peluang bagi adanya Peraturan Gubernur yang dibentuk tanpa ada perintah, mengingat dalam pendelegasian kewenangan mengatur harus ada perintah sehingga jelas ruang lingkup materi yang diatur dan jenis peraturannya; b. Ketidakjelasan dalam pasal tersebut berkaitan dengan materi muatan menyangkut pelaksanaan otonomi daerah dan tugas pembantuan tidak dibenarkan didelegasikan, tetapi harus diatur sendiri dalam Peraturan Daerah, mengingat Peraturan Gubernur merupakan peraturan perundang-undangan yang bersifat pendelegasian, artinya dalam Peraturan Gubernur tidak dimuat mengenai pokok-pokok yang baru, melainkan hanya menyelenggarakan pokok-pokok yang telah diatur dalam Perda. Menarik untuk dikaji dengan melihat ketentuan Pasal tersebut diatas menunjukkan ketidakjelasan atau kekaburan norma vague norm mengenai boleh tidaknya membuat Peraturan Gubernur untuk melaksanakan Peraturan Daerah tanpa adanya ketentuan yang tegas menentukan pembuatan Peraturan Gubernur.

2. Rumusan Masalah.