PT KERETA API INDONESIA PERSERO
LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2013
271
Supporting Business Report
Business Prospects and Corporate Strategy
Analysis Managerial Discussion
serta komitmennya terhadap KPI yang tertuang dalam kontrak manajemen. Dewan Komisaris sesuai
kewenangannya melakukan
pengawasan dan
penilaian atas kinerja Direksi baik secara individual maupun kolegial serta melaporkan hasilnya kepada
Pemegang Saham. Penilaian kinerja Direksi tahun 2013 berdasarkan telaah kriteria, capaian target, dan
indikator kinerja utama KPI yang telah diaudit oleh Auditor Independen Kantor Akuntan Publik KAP
Hadori Sugiarto AdiRekan. Dewan Komisaris telah menyampaikan hasil kinerja
Direksi secara kolegial dan individu kepada RUPS yang tertuang dalam Laporan Tugas Pengawasan
Dewan Komisaris yang disampaikan dalam RUPS Pengesahan Laporan Keuangan Tahunan dan PKBL
PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero tahun 2013.
b. Kriteria Asesmen
1 Kriteria asesmen atas kinerja anggota Dewan
Komisaris tahun 2012 khususnya untuk aspek tata kelola mengacu pada Surat Sekretaris
Meneg BUMN No.S-16S.MBU2012 tanggal 6 Juni 2012 tentang IndikatorParameter
Penilaian dan Evaluasi atas Penerapan GCG pada BUMN.
2 Kriteria asesmen atas kinerja Direksi tahun
2013 untuk aspek operasional mengacu pada Keputusan Meneg BUMN No. S-676
MBU2004 tanggal 22 Desember 2004 tentang penerapan KPI Key Performance
Indicators yang tertuang dalam Kontrak Manajemen Direksi tahun 2012.
c. Asesor Asesmen atas capaian kinerja Dewan Komisaris dari
aspek tata kelola dilakukan oleh BPKP perwakilan Jawa Barat yang hasilnya akan disampaikan kepada
Pemegang Saham. Asesmen atas capaian kinerja Direksi yang tertuang dalam KPI tahun 2013 dinilai oleh
Auditor Independen yaitu KAP Hadori Sugiarto Adi Rekan yang hasilnya termuat dalam Laporan No. 025
LAI-KAIII2014. commitment to the KPIs set out in the management
contract. BOC, in accordance with their authorities, conducted the supervision and evaluation on the
performance of the Board of Directors, both individually and collegially, and report the results to the Shareholders.
Assessment of the performance of Directors in 2013 is based on study criteria, BOD in 2013 was done and key
performance indicators KPIs that had been audited by the Independent Auditor, namely Accounting Firm KAP
Hadori Sugiarto Adi Partners. BOC has delivered the performance results of BOD–
both collegially and individually–to the GMS, to the general meeting of shareholders which is set out in the
Supervisory Report of the Board of Commissioners presented in the GMS for the Endorsement of the Annual
Financial Statements and Partnership and Community Development Program PKBL of PT Kereta Api Indonesia
Persero in 2013. b. Assessment criteria
1 Assessment criteria for the performance of
members of the Board of Commissioners in 2012 especially for governance aspects refers to
the Letter of the Secretary to the State Minister of SOE No. S-16S.MBU2012 dated June 6,
2012 on indicatorsAssessment Parameters and Evaluation of the Implementation of GCG in
SOEs. 2
Assessment criteria for the performance of the Board of Directors in 2013 for the operational
aspects refers to the Decision of Minister of State, No-676MBU2004 dated December
22, 2004 on the application of KPIs Key Performance Indicators which are set out in
the Management Contract for the Board of Directors in 2012.
c. Assessors Assessment for the performance achievement of BOC
from the aspects of governance was conducted by CDPD by BPK West Java representatives, whose results
were submitted to the Shareholders. Assessment over the achievement of performance of BOD which was
contained in KPIs for the year 2013 was assessed by the Independent Auditor, namely KAP Hadori Sugiarto Adi
Partners whose results were contained in Report No. 025LAI-KAIII2014.
PT KERETA API INDONESIA PERSERO
2013 ANNUAL REPORT
www.kereta-api.co.id
272
2. Asesmen GCG Atas Dewan Komisaris dan Direksi
a. Proses Asesmen Asesmen atas penerapan tata kelola anggota Dewan
Komisaris dan Direksi di tahun 2012 telah dilaksanakan oleh pihak independen BPKP Perwakilan Provinsi
Jawa Barat. Periode yang dinilai adalah tahun 2012 periode 1 januari 2012 s.d 31 Desember 2012.
Sedangkan untuk tahun 2013 dilakukan secara self assessment dengan periode 1 januari 2013 s.d 31
Desember 2013. Proses pengumpulan data asesmen dilakukan melalui kajian dokumen, penyebaran
kuesioner, wawancara dan observasi. Selanjutnya, data yang terkumpul dianalisisdiolah serta diberikan
penilaian berdasarkan tingkat capaian aktual dari masing-masing parameter, dibandingkan dengan
bobot dari masing-masing parameter. b. Kriteria Asesmen
Asesmen GCG tahun 2012 menggunakan kriteria dan parameter baru yang diterbitkan Sekretaris Meneg
BUMN No.S-16S.MBU2012 tanggal 6 Juni 2012 tentang IndikatorParameter Penilaian dan Evaluasi atas Penerapan
GCG pada BUMN. Kriteria asesmen atas Dewan Komisaris terdiri atas 12 indikator dan 43 parameter, sedangkan
kriteria asesmen atas Direksi terdiri atas 13 indikator dan 52 parameter yang wajib dipenuhi untuk mencapai kinerja
tata kelola yang baik. c. Asesor
PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero telah menunjuk pihak eksternal, yaitu BPKP Perwakilan Jawa Barat
untuk melakukan asesmen GCG terhadap Dewan Komisaris dan Direksi, terkait penerapan GCG. Nilai
assessment atas kinerja Komisaris tahun 2012 oleh BPKP JABAR mencapai 26,281 75,09 dari bobot
35 dan untuk tahun 2013 dengan self assessment mencapai 27,545 78,70 dari bobot 35 sedangkan
nilai Direksi tahun 2012 oleh BPKP JABAR mencapai 25,434 72,67 dari bobot 35 dan untuk tahun 2013
dengan Self Assessment mencapai 29,035 82,96 dari bobot 35.
2. GCG Assessment Over the BOC and BOD
a. Assessment process Assessment to the implementation of governance of
the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors in 2012 was conducted by an independent party CDPD
Representative West Java Province. The period assessed was the fiscal year of 2012 the period 1 January 2012 up
to December 31, 2012. As for the year 2013 only a self- assessment conducted by the period of period 1 January
2013 up to December 31, 2013. The process of data collection for the assessment was done through a due
dilligence of the documents, questionnaires, interviews and observations. Furthermore, the collected data are
analyzedprocessed and given the ratings based on actual achievement levels of each parameter, compared
to the weight of each parameter. b. Assessment criteria
Assessment of GCG in 2012 used the new criteria and parameters which were issued by the Secretary to the State
Minister of SOE No. S-16S.MBU2012 dated June 6, 2012 on indicatorsAssessment Parameters and Evaluation of the
Implementation of GCG in SOEs. The assessment criteria for the Board of Commissioners consist of 12 indicators and 43
parameters, while the assessment criteria for the Board of Directors consist of 13 indicators and 52 parameters that must
be met in order to achieve good governance performance. c. Assessors
PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero has appointed an external party, namely CDPD West Java Representative,
Representative for assessing corporate governance of the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors,
related to the implementation of GCG. Score of assessment of the performance of Commissioners in
2012 by CDPD West Java Reps. reached 26.281 75.09 of the weight of 35 and for the year 2013 with the self-
assessment reached 27.545 78.70 of the weight of 35, while the score of the Board of Directors in 2012
by CDPD West Java Reps. reached 25.434 72.67 of the weight of 35 and for the year 2013 with a self-
assessment reached 29.035 82.96 of the weight of 35.
PT KERETA API INDONESIA PERSERO
LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2013
273
Supporting Business Report
Business Prospects and Corporate Strategy
Analysis Managerial Discussion
d. Hasil Asesmen Hasil asesmen atas penerapan GCG untuk Dewan
Komisaris secara umum adalah baik dengan gambaran skor sebagai berikut:
NO. Indikator
∑ Parameter Bobot
Skor Capaian
NO. Indicator
∑ Parameter Weight
Score Achievement
1 Melaksanakan program pelatihanpembelajaran
secara berkelanjutan. Implement traininglearning programs on a
continual basis. 2
1.348 0.955
71
2 Melakukan pembagian tugas, wewenang dan
tanggung jawab secara jelas serta menetapkan faktor-faktor yang dibutuhkan untuk mendukung
pelaksanaan tugas Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas.
Distribute duties, authorities and responsibilities clearly and establish the factors that are needed
to support the implementation of the duties of the Board of CommissionersBoard of Trustees.
4 2.127
1.635 77
3 Memberikan persetujuan atas rancangan RJPP
dan RKAP yang disampaikan Direksi. Give approval on RJPP and RKAP plan presented
Directors. 2
2.904 2.289
79
4 Memberikan arahan terhadap Direksi atas
implementasi rencana dan kebijakan perusahaan. Give direction to the BOD on the implementation
of company plan and policy. 9
9.593 7.416
77
5 Melaksanakan pengawasan terhadap Direksi atas
implementasi rencana dan kebijakan perusahaan. Carry out supervision to the Board of Directors
on the implementation of plans and policies of the company.
6 6.479
5057 78
6 Melakukan pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan
kebijakan pengelolaan
anak perusahaan
perusahaan patungan. To supervise the implementation of management
policies of subsidiariesjoint ventures. 2
1.504 1.060
70
7 Berperan dalam pencalonan anggota Direksi,
menilai kinerja Direksi individu dan kolegial dan mengusulkan tantieminsentif kinerja sesuai
ketentuan yang berlaku dan mempertimbangkan kinerja Direksi.
Play a role in the nomination of members of the Board of Directors, performance assessment of
the BOD individual and collegial and proposes bonusincentives in accordance with applicable
provisions and considering the performance of the Directors.
3 2.437
1.605 66
d. Assessment results The results of the assessment of the application of GCG
for BOC in general is good with the score as follows: