GCG ASSESSMENT Situs Resmi PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)

Supporting Business Report Business Prospects and Corporate Strategy Analysis and Managerial Discussion PT KERETA API INDONESIA PERSERO LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2013 217 Assesment GCG tahun 2012 dilakukan oleh pihak independen yaitu BPKP Provinsi Jawa Barat. Indikator dan parameter yang digunakan berpedoman pada Surat Keputusan Sekretaris Kementrian BUMN no. SK- 16S.MBU2012 tentang indikatorparameter penilaian dan evaluasi atas penerapan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik pada BUMN. Nilai assesment GCG tahun 2012 yang diperoleh PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero mencapai 70,16 dengan predikat Cukup Baik, nilai Self Assessment 2013 mencapai 83,91 dengan predikat Baik. Hasil Asesmen Pelaksanaan GCG PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero Tahun 2012 dan Self Assessment 2013 Aspek Bobot Skor Capaian Penjelasan Aspect Weight Score Achievements Explanation 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Komitmen 7,0 4,36 5,90 63,26 84,34 Cukup Baik Baik Commitment Good Enough Good Pemegang Saham 9,0 7,16 8,23 79,58 91,50 Baik Sangat Baik Shareholders Good Very Good Dewan Komisaris 35,0 26,28 27,54 75,09 78,70 Baik Baik Board of Commis- sioners Good Good Direksi 35,0 25,43 29,04 72,67 82,96 Cukup Baik Baik Director Good Enough Good Informasi dan Transparansi 9,0 6,92 8,19 76,91 91,04 Baik Sangat Baik Information and Transparency Good Very Good Aspek Lainnya 0,0 0,00 5,00 100,0 - Sangat Baik Other Aspects - Very Good Skor 100,0 70,16 83,91 70,16 83,91 Cukup Baik Baik Score Good Enough Good GCG Assessment in 2012 was conducted by independent party, namely BPKP West Java Province. The Indicators and parameters used are based on the Decree of the Secretary of SOE Ministry No. SK-16S.MBU2012 concerning the Indicatorsparameters of assessment and evaluation on Good Corporate Governance Practice in SOE. The score of GCG assesment for 2012 obtained by PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero reached 70.16 with the predicate Fairly Good, and the score of Self Assessment for 2013 reached 83,91 with the predicate Good. Results of Assessment on GCG practice in PT Kereta Api Indonesia Persero on 2012 and Self Assessment 2013 PT KERETA API INDONESIA PERSERO 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 218 Tahun 2013 PT Kereta Api Indonesia melakukan self assessment menggunakan parameter penilaian berdasarkan pasal 44 Peraturan Menteri Negara BUMN No. PER-01MBU2001 tanggal 1 Agustus 2011. Nilai self assessment GCG yang diperoleh adalah 83,91 dengan predikat BAIK.

G. RINGKASAN HASIL ASSESSMENT GCG 2012 DAN SELF ASSESSMENT 2013

Berdasarkan hasil assessment GCG 2012 dan Self Assessment 2013 terdapat penerapan yang sudah mendapatkan pencapaian terbaik dari masing- masing aspek governance, yaitu: 1. Komitmen Terhadap Penerapan GCG Secara Berkelanjutan. a. Perusahaan memiliki Pedoman Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang baik GCG Code dan Pedoman Perilaku Code of Conduct. b. Perusahaan melaksanakan Pedoman Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang baik dan Pedoman Perilaku secara konsisten. c. Perusahaan melakukan pengukuran terhadap penerapan Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang baik. d. Perusahaan melakukan koordinasi pengelolaan dan administrasi LHKPN Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara. e. Perusahaan melaksanakan Program Pengendalian Gratifikasi sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku. f. Perusahaan melaksanakan kebijakan atas sistem pelaporan atas dugaan penyimpangan pada perusahaan yang bersangkutan whistle blowing system. 2. Aspek Pemegang Saham dan RUPS a. RUPSPemilik modal melakukan peng- angkat an dan pemberhentian Direksi. b. RUPSPemilik Modal memberikan keputusan yang diperlukan untuk menjaga kepentingan usaha perusahaan dalam jangka panjang dan jangka pendek sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan danatau anggaran dasar. c. RUPSPemilik Modal memberikan per setuju- an laporan tahunan termasuk pengesahan laporan keuangan serta tugas pengawasan Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas sesuai In 2013 PT Kereta Api Indonesia conducted self- assessment using the assessment parameter based on the Article 44 of of the Regulation of the Minister of SOE No. PER-01MBU2001 dated 1 August 2011. The score of GCG self-assessment obtained was 83.91 with the predicate GOOD.

G. SUMMARY OF THE 2012 GCG ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND THE

2013 SELF-ASSESSMENT Based on the results of GCG assessment conducted in 2012 and Self-Assessment in 2013, some of the practices had the best result from each aspect of governance, namely: 1. Commitment to Continouse GCG Practice a. The Company has Good Corporate Governance GCG of Manual and Code of Conduct. b. The Company has consistently executed the GCG of Manual and Code of Conduct. c. The Company has carried out a measurement on the Good Corporate Governance practice. d. The Company has coordinated the management and administration of LHKPN State Officials Wealth Report. e. The Company has executed the Program of Gratification Control in accordance with the prevailing provisions. f. The Company has executed the policy on the reporting system over the presumption of distortion in the company whistle blowing system. 2. Shareholders and General Meeting of Shareholders GMS Aspect a. Shareholders or General Meeting of Shareholders have done Board of Directors appointment and dismissal. b. Shareholders or General Meeting of Shareholders made necessary decisions to maintain the Company’s business interests both in the long- term and short-term according to the laws and regulations andor the Company’s statutes. c. Shareholders or General Meeting of Shareholders gave their approval on the annual report including the endorsement of financial report and supervisory duties of the Board of Commissioners Supporting Business Report Business Prospects and Corporate Strategy Analysis and Managerial Discussion PT KERETA API INDONESIA PERSERO LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2013 219 dengan peraturan perundang-undangan danatau anggaran dasar. d. RUPSPemilik Modal mengambil keputusan melalui proses yang terbuka dan adil serta dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. e. Pemegang SahamPemilik Modal melaksana- kan Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang baik sesuai dengan wewenang dan tanggung jawabnya. 3. Aspek Dewan KomisarisPengawas a. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas melaku- kan pembagian tugas, wewenang dan tanggung jawab secara jelas serta menetapkan faktor-faktor yang dibutuhkan untuk mendukung pelaksanaan tugas Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas. b. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas memberi - kan persetujuan atas RJPP Rencana Jangka Panjang Perusahaan dan RKAP Rencana Kerja Anggaran Perusahaan yang disampaikan Direksi. c. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas memberikan arahan terhadap Direksi atas implementasi rencana dan kebijakan perusahaan. d. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas melaku - kan pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan kebijakan pe ngelolaan anak perusahaan perusahaan patungan. e. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas ber- peran dalam pencalonan anggota Direksi, menilai kinerja Direksi individu dan kolegial dan mengusulkan tantieminsentif kinerja sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku dan mempertimbangkan kinerja Direksi. f. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas memantau dan memastikan bahwa praktik tata kelola perusahaan yang baik telah diterapkan secara efektif dan berkelanjutan. g. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas menyelenggarakan rapat Dewan Komisaris Dewan Pengawas yang efektif dan menghadiri rapat Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan. h. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas memiliki Sekretaris Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas untuk mendukung tugas kesekretariatan Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas. i. Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas memiliki Komite Dewan KomisarisDewan Pengawas yang efektif. Board of Supervisors according to the laws and regulations andor the Company’s statutes. d. Shareholders or General Meeting of Shareholders made decisions with through, fairness and responsibility. e. Shareholders have conducted Good Corporate Governance in accordance with their authority and responsibility. 3. Board of CommissionersSupervisors Aspect a. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors made a clear delegation of duties, authorities and responsibilities and affirmed the required factors to support the execution of Board of Commissioners Board of Supervisors duties. b. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors gave their approval on RJPP Corporate Long- Term Plan and RKAP Corporate Action Plan and Budget delivered to the Board of Directors. c. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors briefed the Board of Directors on the implementation of corporate plan and policy. d. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors supervised the execution of policy in managing subsidiariesjoint venture. e. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors participated in nominating Board of Directors, assessed the Board of Directors performance individual and collegial and proposed the tantiemperformance insentive according to the prevailing provision and took the Board of Directors performance into account. f. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors monitored and assured that the Good Corporate Governance practice had been implemented effectively and sustainably. g. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors held Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors meetings in effective ways and attend the Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors meetings in accordance with the laws and regulations. h. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors had its own Secretary to support the duties of the Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors secretariat. i. Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors had an effective Board of CommissionersBoard of Supervisors Committee.